Re: Protesters block MS shuttles in Seattle
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:54 pm
Here is my idealist point of view on this matter:
My wife had student loans some at 14 percent. These were signed for when she was 17, and didn't qualify for financial aid even though only her father worked, and was in no position to pay for her tuition. Sure he cosigned the loans so it wasn't technically taking advantage of a 17 year old, but they couldn't afford it otherwise.
Why is a student loan, backed by the gov, and must be paid even if you die allowed to be 14% when my mortgage is 3.75 and I could tell the bank to go fuck themselves and trash the house making it useless except the land. There is more risk in mortgages than student loans.
I believe people do things based on incentives. I think that making school as expensive as it is the wrong incentive if you really want people to pay taxes.
Everyone that is bitching that nobody pays taxes might want to re-evaluate the incentives in this country. If opportunity is perceived to not exist, then opportunity doesn't exist. So for all the people graduating not knowing how to read because of no child left behind, what are they supposed to do? There are so many things wrong with the education system in this country before you even get to college.
My wife also must have a "useless degree" because she graduated one of the best education schools in the country - RIC , with honors for elementary ed and can't get a job besides being a 2 year old babysitter.
I think it is a lot easier to just say that people are lazy, retarded, went for useless degrees, etc than to admit that there is a problem and actually try to fix it. (I do admit that some people are lazy and have useless degrees but there is still a real problem)
End Rant and back to incentives:
If you really want people to pay taxes and their fair share, education is in the best interest to the entire country, meaning there should be incentives to go to college.
If school was reasonably priced at say 10K per year for 4 to 5 years that is 50K.
If you get a job getting paid 50K per year you will pay 5K per year at 10%, 2.5 K at 5% tax rate. That means that if school were free if you passed your classes, the taxes you will pay will pay for the schooling in 10 to 20 years. So if you work from 24 to 64 that means you pay taxes for 20+ years.
The alternative for our society is 100K school so people don't bother, resort to going on welfare - 30K per year cost instead of paying taxes, then resort to crime, then prison, 50 - 100K COST instead of tax payment.
So what is better for the country?
I don't think everyone should get everything for free but if someone is willing to put in the time and effort and pass the classes, then why not help them when you know it will help everyone in the long run?
My wife had student loans some at 14 percent. These were signed for when she was 17, and didn't qualify for financial aid even though only her father worked, and was in no position to pay for her tuition. Sure he cosigned the loans so it wasn't technically taking advantage of a 17 year old, but they couldn't afford it otherwise.
Why is a student loan, backed by the gov, and must be paid even if you die allowed to be 14% when my mortgage is 3.75 and I could tell the bank to go fuck themselves and trash the house making it useless except the land. There is more risk in mortgages than student loans.
I believe people do things based on incentives. I think that making school as expensive as it is the wrong incentive if you really want people to pay taxes.
Everyone that is bitching that nobody pays taxes might want to re-evaluate the incentives in this country. If opportunity is perceived to not exist, then opportunity doesn't exist. So for all the people graduating not knowing how to read because of no child left behind, what are they supposed to do? There are so many things wrong with the education system in this country before you even get to college.
My wife also must have a "useless degree" because she graduated one of the best education schools in the country - RIC , with honors for elementary ed and can't get a job besides being a 2 year old babysitter.
I think it is a lot easier to just say that people are lazy, retarded, went for useless degrees, etc than to admit that there is a problem and actually try to fix it. (I do admit that some people are lazy and have useless degrees but there is still a real problem)
End Rant and back to incentives:
If you really want people to pay taxes and their fair share, education is in the best interest to the entire country, meaning there should be incentives to go to college.
If school was reasonably priced at say 10K per year for 4 to 5 years that is 50K.
If you get a job getting paid 50K per year you will pay 5K per year at 10%, 2.5 K at 5% tax rate. That means that if school were free if you passed your classes, the taxes you will pay will pay for the schooling in 10 to 20 years. So if you work from 24 to 64 that means you pay taxes for 20+ years.
The alternative for our society is 100K school so people don't bother, resort to going on welfare - 30K per year cost instead of paying taxes, then resort to crime, then prison, 50 - 100K COST instead of tax payment.
So what is better for the country?
I don't think everyone should get everything for free but if someone is willing to put in the time and effort and pass the classes, then why not help them when you know it will help everyone in the long run?