Re: Shopping for a new tablet
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2020 7:08 am
Hmm. Wonder if that was an early model. This should be easy enough to test on my own I guess.Already during our detailed test of the Surface Laptop i5, we were a little surprised to learn that Microsoft has resorted to the rarely used Core i7-7660U instead of the widely used Core i7-7600U. Here, the decision was clearly in favor of the graphics power, which represents the difference between the two processors. While the Intel Core i7-7660U has the pleasure with the Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU, the Core i7-7600U would only have had the weaker HD Graphics 620 GPU, which is about half a year older. With the Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU, we hope the Surface Laptop i7 will have a clear advantage in graphics-heavy applications, but no wonders in games.
In direct comparison to the Surface Laptop Intel Core i5-7200U, the stronger Surface Laptop i7-7660U clocks up to 4 GHz with the Turbo by 900 MHz. Thus, the i7 achieves quite acceptable values in the Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit test and, as expected, ranks in front of the devices with the Intel Core i7-7600U. But stop! At least that's what it looks like on paper and in the lab. In practice, the whole thing behaves differently, the spoiler here is called Throttling.
Although Throttling has barely noticed on the Surface Laptop i5 with a relatively small power drop of only 7%, and only after several benchmark passes, the Surface Laptop i7 with the Intel Core i7-7660U records major power losses after just a few minutes of continuous stress. Both the Surface Laptop i7 and the Surface Pro i7 (2017), both equipped with the same CPU, ultimately lose between 12 and 17% of performance on the Cinebench R15 loop. Taking these performance losses into account, the Intel Core i7-7660U processors settle a few places lower near the i7-7500U, such as the Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819.
Seems like it is 10-30% faster than the i5 overall except in extreme throttling cases where the advantage shrinks to under 10%.As expected, the system performance of the Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 is above the i5 model and also above the Surface Pro i7 (2017).
As sobering as the performance slump was with the CPU, the comparison of the built-in Samsung PM971 KUS040202M 512-GB SSD with the Toshiba THNSN128GTYA of the Surface Laptop i5 model, which had to leave the springs miserably on our Surface laptop i5 test report, is pleasing. In almost all measurement categories, the i7 with the built-in Samsung SSD is clearly ahead of the Surface Laptop i5.
Wow, it shows a solid 40% better in GPU benchmarks than the Surface Laptop with the i5 and Intel HD620 graphics. That is something for sure.We were excited about the performance of the Intel Core i7-7660U integrated Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU. This should far exceed the HD Graphics 620 of the Intel Core i5. The Iris Plus Graphics 640 clocks up to 1,050 MHz, but has twice as many execution units (48) in the GT3e expansion stage of the Kaby Lake GPU.
Also damn, this does a great job. Not sure how much I need good audio, as I have my Soundcore BT speaker but it's always good to have good built-in audio I suppose. Apparently this is in the top like 96% of all laptops they've tested. That's pretty incredible for such a thin and light device. I was not expecting this.Microsoft Surface Laptop i7 Audio Analysis
(±) | Moderately loud loudspeaker (78
dB) Bass100 - 315 Hz
(±) | Lowerbass - 7.7% lower than
median(-) | No linear bass playback (16.6% delta
to predecessor)midtones 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids, differing from median
only 3.8%(+) | linear mids (4.8% delta
to predecessor)tweets 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced tweets, differing from median only
1.6%(+) | very linear tweets (4.6% delta
to predecessor)Total in audible range 100 - 16,000 Hz
(+) | audible range is very linear (10.4% distance from the median
Compared to all devices in the sameclass
» 3% of all tested devices of this class were better, 1% comparable, 96% worse» The best device has a delta value of 8%, average is 20%, the worst device has 50%
Compared to all devicestested
» 3% of all devices tested were better, 2% comparable, 96% worse
Seems to be about 9% worse than the i5 version overall.When idle, the Microsoft Surface i7 is similar to the Surface Laptop i5 when it consumes power, and the average consumption of the more powerful i7 CPU is 25% higher under full load. It's pleasing that Microsoft has managed to reduce idle power consumption compared to the Surface Pro, even though the Surface Pro also has an Intel Core i7-7660U. It should be noted, however, that the Surface Pro already caught our eye at that time in the test report with the above-average energy intake compared to its competitors.
So you can kill it in just under 2 hours if you run everything balls to the wall. The video test reveals good optimization for that, and that reaches nearly 13 hours of playback. The web test says about 7-1/2 hours and that seems about right I guess. Should be more than adequate for my needs.Looking at battery life, the Surface Laptop i7 behaves the same as we expected when Wi-Fi is turned on and at full load. When playing videos, the i7 laptop lasts even longer than the Surface Pro or MacBook Pro 13,but doesn't quite get close to the peak running times of the Dell XPS 13.
Battery
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 47min
Load (full brightness)
1h 51min
Overall this seems fine. Faster SSD, definitely faster GPU, and the CPU does have more performance available as long as you aren't asking for like sustained 100% load for minutes on end. Honestly that wouldn't likely happen with how I intend to use it. So the fast CPU for short bursts should make it feel quite snappy.It's not easy for us to get a quick conclusion on the Microsoft Surface Laptop i7. The Intel Core i7-7660U is and remains a double-edged sword. On the one hand, we have the disappointing turbo performance that Microsoft hasn't learned from the mistakes of the past on the Surface Pro i7 (2017).
Due to Throttling, the advantage of the higher turbo clock of the Intel Core i7-7660U can hardly be played out at continuous continuous load, but in terms of price, a total 350 Euro surcharge for the i7 compared to the i5-7200U is due.
On the other hand, once the first disappointment is overcome, it becomes clear that not only the i7 finds itself in the price. The stronger Iris Plus Graphics 640, which is integrated into the Intel Core i7-7660U, and the much faster SSD must also be taken into account. Although it would be more appropriate to criticize Toshiba's lame SSD in the i5 model rather than praise the brisk Samsung SSD in the i7. Even the stronger Iris Plus Graphics 640 is definitely the better choice for graphics-heavy applications, but it doesn't turn the i7 Surface laptop into a gaming laptop.
As with the i5 model, the missing USB Type-C ports and SD card readers are also noticeable here, even if this is probably not the top priority for everyone when making a purchase decision. Nor is the surface material from Alcantara a decisive criterion for purchasing, although this is admittedly a welcome change from the usual cheap-looking plastic surfaces. There is therefore nothing to complain about the workmanship, the housing is of high quality and the overall impression is correct. Mobility can also be described as very good with its long battery life. Microsoft is targeting students with the Surface laptops, who should easily get through everyday life at university, especially with the more affordable i5 version for students with slightly longer battery life.
Finally, the initial question remains whether the handle to the Surface Laptop i7 is recommended. From our point of view, the only criticism is the repeatedly mentioned drop in performance, which occurs after a few minutes in turbo mode. Nevertheless, the i7 remains the faster device with better CPU and GPU performance even during throttling. If the faster Samsung SSD is taken into account, the choice of surface laptop i7 is quite reasonable.