kevm14 wrote:billgiacheri wrote:Couple options with the talk of an STS-V:
1. CTS-V, B/D Body, 5K STS V8 = 11K + 2K + 5K = 18K
2. Nice B/D Body w/money for upgrades/swap, STS-V = 7K + 11K = 18K
A little more math.
1. Keep CTS-V, add B/D body ($4k), and add a cheap STS as a daily ($6k). Total additional cash required to complete: $10k.
Pros: I get to keep the CTS-V as the clean, good car. It would be my handling car, manual trans, fun to drive. I get a B/D body, and a daily driver for me that Jamie can drive.
Cons: B/D body has no budget left for mods in this scenario (near term anyway). I only get one garage bay so that clean B/D body is probably staying outside.
2. Sell CTS-V (-$11k), obtain B/D body ($5k + $5k for mods), obtain STS-V ($11k). Total additional cash required to complete: $10k. B/D body goes in the garage.
Pros: I theoretically have the car and a budget for some kind of B/D body build plus starting with a $1k better car. STS-V gives me a very nice daily with an automatic trans that Jamie can drive.
Cons: I lose out on the CTS-V handling/manual car. I was talking about upgrading to a C5Z so this would be a step in the complete opposite direction.
These options are pretty different.
#1 is the more conventional option that I thought I was pursuing. #2 is a bit of a shakeup.
I have to say though if I got rid of the CTS-V, I guess I'd want the black one. But it would see daily driver duty, split with the B/D body in nicer weather. If I kept the CTS-V, the cheaper the better. Though if they did $11k for the black one, and knowing that silver one is $10k + $500 in HP Tuners to program out the CEL....it would be hard to say no to the black one. This is where I'd do a remote inspection and possibly even have it shipped. Possibly.
Let me also add a third option.
3. Keep CTS-V, get STS-V ($11k). Total cash required to complete: $11k.
Pros: I get to keep the CTS-V and get an STS-V for daily duties and Jamie could drive it just like #2.
Cons: Uhh...no B/D body. And dropping $11k right at this moment is going to be a very hard sell. I am currently getting pressure to deal with the kitchen.
When I talk about the STS-V unable to fulfill the handling car mission, this is what I mean (
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons ... s-v-page-3):
Where the Caddy fared worst was in Grattan's twists and turns. Although the steering was quick and nicely weighted, excessive up-and-down motion in the suspension inhibited transient responses, and observers noted substantial brake dive compared with the German cars.
By the time the V2 hit the streets in 2009, they had that MR suspension dialed right in but apparently the 2006 STS-V was calibrated for comfort, not world-beating handling (with a lot of comfort still). For daily driving I know you could argue the suspension is plenty good enough. But I remember a thread on the Cadillac forum about G meter peaks. Many of these guys were looking at like 0.8x in daily driving and more than one guy ran The Dragon and was still barely into the low 0.9x range. Some guys just don't push the handling and those guys would be plenty satisfied with the STS-V. I don't know if I would in the context of selling the CTS-V. If I kept the CTS-V, well, that's different. Problem with that plan is we took the first step to spending a bunch of money on our kitchen by meeting with RIHI for 2 hours. That number is going to be ridiculous and will probably become the target for us to save for, which means frivolous car purchases are not going to be authorized. So dropping $11k on an STS-V and keeping the CTS-V is probably not going to happen. I DO think there is still budget for a daily type car that I like and she could drive occasionally. Which is the $6k budget area for all the things we've been talking about.
Really I'd love a V2 in my garage, taking the place of my CTS-V. I guess that is my goal. Which means I shouldn't be wasting $11k on an STS-V but spending more like $6k on a regular STS. I can also still get a clean B-body but the key issue there is, I can really only have one garage queen type car. Parking outside is not a good way to treat a car that I want to last.
The other thing is, if I get a D-body, that extra length is actually a bit of a problem. It will fit in my garage for sure but the way the cars are organized is my car is closest to the door and the wife/kids walk by it to get to her car. With a Fleetwood in there, the car would be so far back that it would be a pain to walk around, especially with the stuff I have in there.
I could switch and use the far bay which would help. One minor annoyance there is that the Homelink in the 2008 SRX just cannot talk to the Chamberlain-style rolling code of the other garage door opener so I'd have to throw an opener on the visor in the SRX. I am not going to let that get in the way of an otherwise executable car plan. But really, the issue the whole time with my CTS-V bay is its location. Jamie had a learning curve with the current bay, and that included some close calls and some actual hits. The CTS-V bay is going to be really difficult with the retaining wall right there as far as backing out and pulling in. I think that is an issue. I could stage an experiment and see how it would actually be. I don't think it would be impossible.