Re: CR: 12 Models Lose CR Recommendation Over Car Reliabilit
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2018 1:18 pm
Here's an article on turbo engine reliability. The chart is interactive and shows what engine is under each dot.
Don't be a tool, repair it.
https://forums.kevinallenmoore.com/
Yes, I am sure Audi led him to a significant amount of car repair.I owe my career to two fateful events: my father buying a 1965 Corvette and my purchase of an Audi A4 rather than a Chevy Tahoe. The Corvette jump-started my love of cars, and the Audi led me to automotive journalism, track days, and amateur car repair. In my free time I cycle as much as possible, no matter the season.
So the Charger is above average and the Challenger is below average. I thought they were basically the same. They have different transmissions?the Charger sedan improved to better than average,... The Challenger coupe had problems with the transmission. The Durango and Journey SUVs had multiple problem areas. All three remained below average.
That isn't really much to brag about...LOLCR lacks data to rank Alfa Romeo, Fiat, Jaguar, Land Rover, Maserati, Mitsubishi, or Smart.
Too bad they couldn't put those brands in, because I think they would ALL rank below Cadillac.
Welcome to CR. Again I think they try to conflate "happiness" or overall satisfaction with the brand with "reliability." And I think there is a core CR reader that totally believes that. So literally any nuisance that you could vaguely put in the "reliability" category gets attributed as a reliability issue. I guess I'd play devil's advocate. Think of a hypothetical customer who has a car that has one or more of the following:bill25 wrote:So the Charger is above average and the Challenger is below average. I thought they were basically the same. They have different transmissions?the Charger sedan improved to better than average,... The Challenger coupe had problems with the transmission. The Durango and Journey SUVs had multiple problem areas. All three remained below average.
Yeah. I mean I was half joking. I'm like, man, how can Cadillac really be last? Then I saw those brands and was like....oh, they probably aren't actually last.bill25 wrote:That isn't really much to brag about...LOLCR lacks data to rank Alfa Romeo, Fiat, Jaguar, Land Rover, Maserati, Mitsubishi, or Smart.
Too bad they couldn't put those brands in, because I think they would ALL rank below Cadillac.