bill25 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2020 7:49 pm
I don't actually have a problem with most of this. I like Tesla, and that is like half of it (ok 1/3). The Volt was good and I don't get why they didn't evolve that.
I think GM had pretty clear messaging that the Volt served its purpose. With the Bolt available around the same price, there is no need for a range extended EV (plug in hybrid). They applied knowledge to the Volt learned back in EV1 times, and the Volt paved the way for the Bolt. Also, the Volt wasn't better than the Prius on being a regular hybrid, but it lead the market on the plug-in side. Plus it was a little better to drive.
I like the 911 (I like the Cayman better), Navigator and Hellcat Challenger. The CTS-V is ok, wagon or not, but would still prefer the ZL1.
I could have accepted "V-series Cadillacs" but I get the specific reference to the V2 wagon w/ manual. It isn't just talk, it has the highest resale value for any V-series Cadillac. Off the top of my head I'd say a $10-20k premium for a manual V2 wagon over the rest. And again, that story was cool.
The G8 GXP experienced something similar. A bit too early to see what happens to the SS but values have at least held.
Bolt, Leaf, Google car, VW, and Volvo are a joke though...
I'll back the Bolt for the reasons cited - I think it will stand the test of time.
Enter the Bolt, years ahead of the Tesla Model 3, at a price point the average commuter could afford, with a legitimate 230 miles of range, and zippy performance and handling that would be laudable in a gasoline-powered Euro econo-hatchback.
The Leaf I kind of get. Google Car I barely read and don't care. Volvo XC90 is a little questionable but I think that vehicle was the first to put the brand back on the premium map after some wandering around post Ford. I don't know that the "Volvo story" is top 15 though....which is your point.
I would say:
- Gen 5 Camaro - It brought respect back to the category by challenging the market with +100 HP to what was being sold, and it looks awesome, and is basically the best vehicle ever made in history, let alone the last 10 years.
Well...obviously there is some tongue in cheek stuff going on there so I will respond accordingly. But don't be too revisionist. The Challenger came out in 2008 with an SRT8 variant using the existing 6.1L Hemi (available back in the 2005 300C & Magnum, 2006 Charger & Grand Cherokee SRT8). It had 425 hp. Modern muscle most assuredly did not begin with the 2010 Camaro. The Camaro did, however, cause the Mustang to improve, so there's that. But the launch Camaro was not great to drive. Only post-Coyote Mustang did the gen 5 really begin to shine.
Fails:
Chrysler now being FCA
The Ford Explorer, because I want one, but they suck
Chevrolet/Ford getting rid of all of their cars
The Viper being retired
The Corvette not keeping its drivetrain setup (At least in lower trims)
The Corvette spaceship interior
The gen 6 Camaro refreshes - granted, the latest is better, but, well, not enough
Mach-E Branding
Diesel-gate
Nissan CVTs, Rogue, etc. etc. etc.
End of the Ford/Mazda partnership, or whatever it was.
Addition of complexity - turbo everything (but not in a cool performance way), hybrid everything, engine stop/start upon stopping
Supra
NSX?
BRZ/86 - no supped up version
Dodge not updating the Challenger platform for another 30 years
Chevy killing the Camaro again
Cadillac can't sell cars, compressed the ATS and CTS to the CT5
I'll just pick and choose from this list.
Chevrolet/Ford getting rid of all of their cars
I noticed you don't lament FCA getting rid of their cars. That's probably because they weren't any good. At least GM and Ford had some decent offerings before they got rid of them.
The Corvette not keeping its drivetrain setup (At least in lower trims)
The Corvette spaceship interior
I think it's too early to make that call, unless this is just your personal list of fails, not serious article content suggestions. It's not a serious position to say a major, notable failure of the past 15 years is the C8 interior and styling.
Addition of complexity - turbo everything (but not in a cool performance way), hybrid everything, engine stop/start upon stopping
There is some non-powertrain complexity, too, that probably belongs in this fail list. However, a lot of it supports autonomous driving which I understand the car enthusiast is supposed to be in support of.
The Supra I guess has some redeeming qualities as a driver's car but I think the hate/fail list on it is longer than the cool list, and that's the point.
NSX, yes certainly for me.
Dodge not updating the Challenger platform for another 30 years
Yes. LX is old. However, Wiki claims LX only ran until 2010. And the Challenger was on "LC" even then but that was just a shortened LX. I didn't realize it but the Challenger is on a 4" shorter wheelbase than the sedans. Sure hasn't lead to any noticeable weight savings. Probably just a proportions thing.
The 2011 redesign brought a new platform designator called LD and then in 2015 the Challenger was updated on LA.
The LD platform was introduced in 2011 for the second generation of the Charger. It is an entirely redesigned and updated platform but is closely related to the original LX.
Ha. I love that double-speak. That's why people say what they do.
Cadillac can't sell cars, compressed the ATS and CTS to the CT5
It's true. The CT6, particularly with the 2020 update and availability of the super rare V, is certainly a pretty legitimate Cadillac flagship sedan. But of course it's pretty much going away. Not many people are buying it. I'm not sure Cadillac would be wise to then put money into a CT8 flagship, for even more money, at least based on CT6 sales data. That deserves a real analysis. The cars got better but sales declined. I'd like to see a through analysis about internal vs external influences, marketing, and so on. I don't know that it's any one thing but the V cars were always niche and despite a ton of positive press, and their constant improvement from gen to gen, failed to move lower trim product. Maybe that's because the V-series was never about over the top luxury and Cadillac is supposed to be a luxury brand first. The thing is, I don't need anything more luxurious than what any given V-series provides but I think other luxury buyers do. And the non-V Cadillacs, despite getting better and better, were still not compelling luxury cars in their own right. A simplified analysis. There is probably a LOT more that can be said and pulled out of the annals of history.
Sales data/discussion for mid-size luxury cars is here:
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=2183&p=21356#p21356