kevm14 wrote:Interesting findings at Tire Pros as well.
I saw two techs looking at the rear frame section. The verdict was, do a windshield and it'll pass. He said there is some frame rot. I said well is it bad? He said, "no, I've seen far worse." i was like "so its not going to fall off or anything?". He said no, not at all. He did ask if it was my daily driver. I said I just bought a car yesterday. So I will do a windshield.
Then I asked about emissions. I said, hey, put it on the dyno just so I know it will pass. He said "we don't do that anymore.". After some back and forth, it would appear that RI has finally caught up to Mass and gotten rid of emissions on OBD-I.
I also asked about engine swaps. He didn't seem to have any requirements. As long as it isn't obnoxiously loud and passes the OBD-II test it should be fine. It use a pre-96 car. Not bad at all.
Got my new windshield on Saturday.
WP_20170527_14_59_47_Pro.jpg
It was processed as a comprehensive claim, for which I have a $250 deductible.
There was plenty of rust around the windshield frame. It was still solid enough that he wire brushed it down and put some kind of fancy primer on it. It shouldn't leak.
WP_20170527_14_59_19_Pro.jpg
WP_20170527_14_59_23_Pro.jpg
Anyway I got my sticker. When the tech got out of my car, he was like "nice car" but I couldn't quite read his level of sarcasm. So I preempted him and said "well I'm trying to get 2 more years out of it." He clarified: "yeah a lot of miles, but it runs good, it really does" or something. Apparently parking lot snap is how the health of engines is judged.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.