Is it this kind? https://youtu.be/pk9lbLOksE8?si=ObI7qrTyf-vlP1iY&t=579
EIA standard tantalum chip capacitor? Needs more research. Hopefully these are the kind that don't leak.
Internet says dry tantalum caps don't leak as long as the "outer coating" is intact. It also seems like even if they are the wet kind, the electrolyte is actually retained inside unlike the cheap aluminum kind that I am replacing. I may try to check a few in circuit and not worry about it much further. Phew.
Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Replaced the 3 aluminum electrolytic caps as planned. Seems to work fine and has had no further errors. It's been working pretty hard, too, as I installed Windows 95 and some other stuff.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
More pics. Ended up installing IE 5 but it only supports 40 bit encryption so still not what I need. It does hit Google though.
Retrozilla had WAY too high of hardware requirements.
I also went down a rabbit hole because the filesystem is running MS-DOS compatibility mode. But I think the reason is because the ESDI system (and the MCA port it uses) is 16-bit. So the system is just too old for 32-bit hard drive stuff. Oh well.
Retrozilla had WAY too high of hardware requirements.
I also went down a rabbit hole because the filesystem is running MS-DOS compatibility mode. But I think the reason is because the ESDI system (and the MCA port it uses) is 16-bit. So the system is just too old for 32-bit hard drive stuff. Oh well.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Took a closer look at my NIC.
Turns out I have rev E of the old version of the PCB. Perhaps there is something wrong with my AUI adapter. Or maybe I should replace the three electrolytic caps...
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/3c523.html
Then I found this:
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/Ethernet_Bench.html
In theory the 3C523 is a decent card....
So I splurged and ordered TWO.
Card 1.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/232841819187
Olicom 2335 which is a 10/100 card though the link above says it is cheesy. I guess cheesy means ISA hardware barely adapted to MCA (therefore not taking advantage of anything). Also tiny buffers. I'll give it a whirl as it is reportedly the only MCA card capable of 100 Mbit. They tested it to about 24 MBit which is far short of 100 but I'll note is higher than 10.
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/Olicom_OC2335.html
Card 2.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/205303434553?_ ... R9Sd7P6jZQ
IBM Lan Adapter/A
A 32 bit card that supposedly works in a 16 bit slot and that's the only free slot I have so it better. Like the Olicom it has on-board RJ45.
This card seems like quality hardware and also had some fast transfer rates with low CPU utilization. That's something. About 8.6 Mbit which is similar to my 3C523 but using almost half the CPU on a 486.
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/LAN_A.html
We'll see how the machine and Win 95 likes these when I receive them. Just want a functional NIC (receive performance has always been unexplainably slow, even 21 years ago according to some archived e-mails I found).
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/3c523.html
Then I found this:
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/Ethernet_Bench.html
In theory the 3C523 is a decent card....
So I splurged and ordered TWO.
Card 1.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/232841819187
Olicom 2335 which is a 10/100 card though the link above says it is cheesy. I guess cheesy means ISA hardware barely adapted to MCA (therefore not taking advantage of anything). Also tiny buffers. I'll give it a whirl as it is reportedly the only MCA card capable of 100 Mbit. They tested it to about 24 MBit which is far short of 100 but I'll note is higher than 10.
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/Olicom_OC2335.html
Card 2.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/205303434553?_ ... R9Sd7P6jZQ
IBM Lan Adapter/A
A 32 bit card that supposedly works in a 16 bit slot and that's the only free slot I have so it better. Like the Olicom it has on-board RJ45.
This card seems like quality hardware and also had some fast transfer rates with low CPU utilization. That's something. About 8.6 Mbit which is similar to my 3C523 but using almost half the CPU on a 486.
https://www.ardent-tool.com/NIC/LAN_A.html
We'll see how the machine and Win 95 likes these when I receive them. Just want a functional NIC (receive performance has always been unexplainably slow, even 21 years ago according to some archived e-mails I found).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
So for the network I can just sell whatever I don't want to keep (including my old 3C523).
But I also ordered a "new" sound card.
https://texelec.com/product/resound-new-wave-mca/
This is on backorder so hopefully it is fulfilled at some point. Ordered it on 2/11 I think. I guess I may end up getting a NIC or two before the sound card. Also, these new cards will have to share the 16-bit slot as the two 32-bit slots are taken up by important stuff: XGA/2 card and RAM card.
Needs moar tower with more 32 bit slots. Then I could get a 32 bit SCSI card and have some performance for my file system. The Model 80 is the tower version and has many slots.
But I also ordered a "new" sound card.
https://texelec.com/product/resound-new-wave-mca/
This is on backorder so hopefully it is fulfilled at some point. Ordered it on 2/11 I think. I guess I may end up getting a NIC or two before the sound card. Also, these new cards will have to share the 16-bit slot as the two 32-bit slots are taken up by important stuff: XGA/2 card and RAM card.
Needs moar tower with more 32 bit slots. Then I could get a 32 bit SCSI card and have some performance for my file system. The Model 80 is the tower version and has many slots.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Olicom card
I think the card works (it had link lights that lit up) but I could not make the Windows 95 driver work to save my life. I think it works in literally every other OS. Sigh. So this one is probably going back to eBay (to sell).
If I have the patience, I might try the 16 bit Win 3.x driver and see if I can get it working that way. I think I'm selling it either way but in the interest of fill disclosure I can report what I know about the card's function in my eBay ad. And frankly if the 16 bit driver worked that is a better story than "it didn't work at all for me."
If I have the patience, I might try the 16 bit Win 3.x driver and see if I can get it working that way. I think I'm selling it either way but in the interest of fill disclosure I can report what I know about the card's function in my eBay ad. And frankly if the 16 bit driver worked that is a better story than "it didn't work at all for me."
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Then my reference disk that I've been adding to just....blew up.
Made a brand new one with one of my new 3M disks (the old one was on one of my old CompuServe disks). Making the stock disk is easy as it's an executable self extractor disk image maker. But then I have to one by one add the option disk stuff to it for the cards I have otherwise it doesn't know what to do with any of the cards and can't auto configure itself.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Posted from an IBM PS/2 Model 70
Next I tried the IBM LAN Adapter/A. It turns out I didn't understand the ad - this card was new old stock. Crazy. Even crazier it seems to have been made in 2003. That is really late production. The card has been around since the early 90s (in an older board revision) so that is nuts.
Looks brand new, and smelled brand new. In original packaging. That's cool.
This is a 32 bit card but it has a notch on the bus connector to fit into a 16 bit slot and it will work in 16-bit mode. I did plan for this and sure enough it slid right in and the dangling extra 32-bit section didn't interfere with anything on the motherboard.
Booted up, did the option disk thing, configured the system (as you can see above) and it was good.
Booted Win95 expecting plug and play. It turns out I don't think MCA supports real plug and play. You have to run the add hardware wizard but with the 3Com card, it would just find the card and work. Not the case with the IBM card. I thought it would just have a driver. So I went looking for drivers and wouldn't you know - there is no Win 9x driver for this damn card. WTF!! There is a driver for every other OS, like NT, OS/2, DOS, Linux. My only option was to run the 16 bit real mode driver for Win 3.x (Win 95 did support this but it chokes performance). That part installed just fine, though it took a while (it loves to request random Win 95 install disks every time I touch network config).
Anyway, the card was working fine now. I installed TCP/IP and did the usual and I was able to ping it. I still couldn't access my Dell laptop via network neighborhood (same with the old 3Com card) which must be a 95 to XP thing not a NIC issue BUT I did test bandwidth by accessing the Model 70 via my Dell. The results? Seemed to transfer files at a reasonable pace now, and mostly saturate the hard drive. MUCH BETTER! Now I'm not getting optimal like DMA/bus mastering/whatever performance from the card with the real mode driver but the whole point was to improve the LAN file transfers and that part was a success!!
In fact I backed up the entire hard drive (minus Windows directory) and that didn't take much more than 10 minutes. We'll call this a win.
So the Olicom definitely is going back to the eBay market (I won't even bother attempting to return to seller based on the policy in the ad). It may be 10/100 but it's basically an ISA card lazily adapted to an MCA form factor with zero extra functions to improve performance. The IBM card is cool so I'm glad it worked in the end even if suboptimally.
This is a 32 bit card but it has a notch on the bus connector to fit into a 16 bit slot and it will work in 16-bit mode. I did plan for this and sure enough it slid right in and the dangling extra 32-bit section didn't interfere with anything on the motherboard.
Booted up, did the option disk thing, configured the system (as you can see above) and it was good.
Booted Win95 expecting plug and play. It turns out I don't think MCA supports real plug and play. You have to run the add hardware wizard but with the 3Com card, it would just find the card and work. Not the case with the IBM card. I thought it would just have a driver. So I went looking for drivers and wouldn't you know - there is no Win 9x driver for this damn card. WTF!! There is a driver for every other OS, like NT, OS/2, DOS, Linux. My only option was to run the 16 bit real mode driver for Win 3.x (Win 95 did support this but it chokes performance). That part installed just fine, though it took a while (it loves to request random Win 95 install disks every time I touch network config).
Anyway, the card was working fine now. I installed TCP/IP and did the usual and I was able to ping it. I still couldn't access my Dell laptop via network neighborhood (same with the old 3Com card) which must be a 95 to XP thing not a NIC issue BUT I did test bandwidth by accessing the Model 70 via my Dell. The results? Seemed to transfer files at a reasonable pace now, and mostly saturate the hard drive. MUCH BETTER! Now I'm not getting optimal like DMA/bus mastering/whatever performance from the card with the real mode driver but the whole point was to improve the LAN file transfers and that part was a success!!
In fact I backed up the entire hard drive (minus Windows directory) and that didn't take much more than 10 minutes. We'll call this a win.
So the Olicom definitely is going back to the eBay market (I won't even bother attempting to return to seller based on the policy in the ad). It may be 10/100 but it's basically an ISA card lazily adapted to an MCA form factor with zero extra functions to improve performance. The IBM card is cool so I'm glad it worked in the end even if suboptimally.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.