Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Non-repair car talk
Post Reply
kevm14
Posts: 15373
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by kevm14 »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc8rjM5dF5o

I like how he's not a Ford guy. Or a Chrysler guy.
Adam
Posts: 2259
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by Adam »

Yeah, just a regular guy.
kevm14
Posts: 15373
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by kevm14 »

According to the youtube comments, he hated on the Miata the least.
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by bill25 »

Not to hate, but this guy spent four and a half minutes not reviewing this car. The only technical details that I was able to get out of this whole thing was that the 300HP car feels like it has 150HP and that it drives like a minivan. That is important feedback, but could have been said in 30 seconds.

As everyone probably knows, I am not a fan of 6 or 4 cylinder "muscle" cars (except the Grand National). But lets be realistic. If you are going to be reviewing a 6 cylinder Mustang compare it against other 2 door cars IN IT'S PRICE RANGE.

Is this car better than a 6 cylinder 2 door Honda Accord? The 6 cylinder Camaro? You can't expect it to be as good as a GT or SS, there is almost 10K between those cars.

Just to put things into perspective, the 6 Mustang is like 22K. A VW GTI is over 30. What do you want for 22K?
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by bill25 »

Wow... Did I just defend a 6 cylinder Mustang?
kevm14
Posts: 15373
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by kevm14 »

I think he had the right idea, saying that what the car symbolizes is more important than the car itself.
Adam
Posts: 2259
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Regular Car Reviews: 2013 Mustang V6

Post by Adam »

If you were looking for a traditional car review, then RCR is not a good place to start. It is more of a commentary on a combination of the car, the time period in which it was made, and sometimes the typical owner. Also strange voices.
Post Reply