Interesting.
http://gmauthority.com/blog/2014/12/a-n ... z3LSa7qVFR
It's an engine calibration thing. Not intake temps. Well, there may also be high oil temp issues with REALLY aggressive track use but I think this "problem" is mainly the conservative PCM tune.
But as our friends at Autoevolution report, tuning group Vengeance Racing did back-to-back dyno testing on their own car and found the intake charge temperature to be impressively cool. Instead, they say, the issue lies with a (perhaps overly) safe ECM tune, which pulls timing long before it has to. This not only helps prevent any chance of detonation, but is also essential for the Corvette Z06 to meet its emissions goals.
But this raised my eyebrow a bit:
Autoevolution reached out to General Motors, who seem to verify what Vengeance Racing has claimed, saying that while they “are confident that the vast majority of customers are going to be more than satisfied” with the stock engine mapping, those who are not can try the tuning aftermarket. But the manufacturer cautions that changing the engine tune will void the warranty, and may lead to driveability and reliability issues.
Emphasis mine. Did GM actually recommend the aftermarket here?
The good news is there is plenty to tap if you do:
http://www.autoevolution.com/news/2015- ... 89790.html
Since the customizer claims the post-intercooler intake air temp is impressive, nobody is quite sure why GM engineers came up with such a conservative ECU tune, with emission regulations being the most plausible reason.
As to what happens with minor bolt-ons and a tune?
For the record, Vengeance Racing’s 2015 Corvette Z06, a manual, showed 585 hp and 611 lb-ft (828 Nm) of torque at the wheels in stock condition, which are very good values. The LT4 has already proven to be a very capable engine, since the tuner has achieved a hefty output bump with less-than-serious mods. To be more specific, the V8 was taken to 660 RWHP and 663 RWTQ (899 Nm) using only a cold air intake, a smaller upper pulley and, of course, an ECU remap.
How about 75rwhp? And the damn thing just came out. 611rwhp with just the tune.
Remember the blurb about GM working on a Gen V LS7 replacement but they couldn't make the emissions work? Well it sounds to me as if the LT4 had a similar problem. That's really disappointing. Between this and CAFE, I do worry about the future of engines that I am interested in.
But this guy disagrees:
http://corvettec7fiasco.blogspot.com/20 ... -soak.html