SS in the low 10s

Non-repair car talk
Post Reply
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

SS in the low 10s

Post by kevm14 »

http://www.lsxtv.com/news/video-chevy-s ... n-the-10s/

Pretty much follows the Sloppy formula:
This recipe makes for what we can only imagine is a wickedly-fun, quiet-looking sleeper straight from the factory. But throw 15 pounds of boost, a cam, methanol and an upgraded torque converter at it, and you have yourself an almost 9-second car.
136 trap....add a few MPH to that and he'll be in the high 9s. And this is on the LS3, which is not optimized for forced induction.

Let me comment on the styling since there are some good shots of it. I still like the way this car looks but I think one of the issues is the styling is just outdated. It looks like it was designed in the late 2000s. As a buyer of used cars, I don't really "see" outdated styling, which is maybe why I don't have a problem with it.
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by bill25 »

I don't think it is so much outdated, more like economy.
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by kevm14 »

Yes outdated.

Here is a 2007 Holden Commodore (VE, aka Pontiac G8)
C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_2006_Holden_Calais_(VE_MY07)_V_sedan_(2015-08-07)_01.jpg
I'd say even then it was fairly conservative styling. In 2016 it just looks old.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by bill25 »

It looks like a generic rental car. Good for a sleeper, bad for anything else design wise...
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by kevm14 »

Well...the thing about sleepers is...they are the best.

http://www.lsxtv.com/news/jack-of-all-t ... a-sleeper/
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by bill25 »

Everything about this is awesome, G-Body, sleeper, everything I have said about GM getting praise for making stuff easy for the aftermarket:
Harland Gilcrest

yah, that 3rd Gen Hemi and the new (whatever designation it is now ) multivalve Ford cammer motor are really something, but they just do NOT get it done the same way that the much more concise and much more cost effective LS pushrod wedge motor does. Plus GM made the EEM on the LS s swap friendly, while Ford did not, and (dumb ass) Chrysler intentionally made their Hemi deal a big pain to swap and modify ...... and then certain people wonder why LS motors are getting stuffed into all kinds of rides. With the plush power of a less expensive LS engine, I can live with all of my pushrods lined up in a row on either side of the motor and with my single cam still in the block. Go GM !

Like · Reply · 2 · Dec 23, 2015 2:32pm
..

Duncan Auclair

Mr. Gilcrest, I couldn't have said it better myself
I think if I were to do a G-Body sleeper, it would be a totally stock looking Regal:

http://car-from-uk.com/ebay/carphotos/f ... 699455.jpg
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_ima ... iginal.jpg
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: SS in the low 10s

Post by kevm14 »

That works. Frankly I'd rather see that than the Malibu anyway. Those cars have been played out on drag strips since the late 90s.
Post Reply