Now 54.5 mpg CAFE target is off the table

Non-repair car talk
Post Reply
kevm14
Posts: 16024
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Now 54.5 mpg CAFE target is off the table

Post by kevm14 »

http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/bu ... dailydrive

Holy shit.

C/D had a good sidebar article about peak engine that talks to the fact that shit has gotten way complicated way too fast and if these regs continue, it'll just expressly drive everything (perhaps prematurely and against the best needs of the consumer) to the electric car.

The point is, maybe our power era is not going to come to a screeching halt. Thank god.
Bob
Posts: 2470
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:36 am

Re: Now 54.5 mpg CAFE target is off the table

Post by Bob »

One simple, easy and highly unpopular way to drive more efficiency into new vehicles is to increase the federal gas tax. Forget about all the loopholes and nonsense, just increase the existing tax and people will start buying more efficient vehicles. The federal gas tax seems to be politically untouchable since it hasn't been increased in over 20 years. Also, the fact that it is fixed at 18.4 cents a gallon and not a percentage means that when adjusted for inflation it is actually significantly lower today than it was in 1993.
Adam
Posts: 2273
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 9:50 pm

Re: Now 54.5 mpg CAFE target is off the table

Post by Adam »

Best news ever.

Should have been obvious that this wasn't going to work by itself. The best thing that happened to fuel mileage averages was $100+/barrel of crude in the recent past.
kevm14
Posts: 16024
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Now 54.5 mpg CAFE target is off the table

Post by kevm14 »

http://www.motortrend.com/news/trump-ca ... standards/

Overall I still err on the side of CAFE is stupid, and broken. And while we may look at CAFE as bringing us a new era of fuel economy, I say the free market may have done more or less the same thing. We don't have the data.

We don't regulate how much power cars can have. Why should we regulate the fuel economy? The "protecting people from themselves" argument is a very slippery slope that has no real teeth imo.

Should we regulate how much alcohol people can buy because some people abuse it? What about food? Should we make credit cards illegal because some people end up in a lot of debt? When you try to regulate common sense, there is always an unintended consequence.

Personal responsibility. Personal freedom. I believe in these things.
Post Reply