http://www.motortrend.com/news/apex-pre ... 707C458EAE
Wow.
M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
Not sure what I am more surprised about,
The M3 being so low,
The Panamera being so high with all of the hate it gets,
The ATS-V winning,
Mercedes being on the list and beating the BMW's and CTS-V,
Or the fact that the SS and Caprice (ok now you know I am trolling) are not on the list.
Go ATS-V! I also guess that means that the new Camaro SS beats all of these. Even better!
The M3 being so low,
The Panamera being so high with all of the hate it gets,
The ATS-V winning,
Mercedes being on the list and beating the BMW's and CTS-V,
Or the fact that the SS and Caprice (ok now you know I am trolling) are not on the list.
Go ATS-V! I also guess that means that the new Camaro SS beats all of these. Even better!
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
I'd be interested to see where the Camaro lands. Though there is no Camaro sedan...
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
I thought sedans had the same performance with extra doors.
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
They do. The ATS-V sedan actually was like a tenth faster than the coupe.
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
24.0 is pretty good. It was among the fastest times.billgiacheri wrote: The M3 being so low,
Yeah it basically tied the smaller and lighter ATS-V. That is most certainly impressive.billgiacheri wrote:The Panamera being so high with all of the hate it gets,
Of course. That was my main "wow" I think.billgiacheri wrote:The ATS-V winning,
I believe the E63 is really the CTS-V competitor. The CTS-V was faster. But hang on: there were THREE Mercedes cars on this list!! I have been paying attention to their performance cars over the past 5 years and they really are doing a very good job. They offer the numbers, the feel and the overall engagement that BMW does not.billgiacheri wrote:Mercedes being on the list and beating the BMW's and CTS-V,
Well...The best SS figure-8, for comparison, was 24.9 @ 0.81G (or 24.8s @ 0.80G for the 2014), so it wouldn't make the list. But then the cars on this list are expensive.billgiacheri wrote:Or the fact that the SS and Caprice (ok now you know I am trolling) are not on the list.
It is possible that the ATS-V is actually the cheapest one on the list. The gen 5 Camaro 1LE ran 24.2 to 24.5 so even it would have been at the bottom of the list. New SS: 24.1. Old Z/28: 23.6 (one tenth faster than the new ATS-V). GT350R turned a 23.3 @ 0.87G which is ridiculous.billgiacheri wrote:Go ATS-V! I also guess that means that the new Camaro SS beats all of these. Even better!
Figure 8 reference: http://forums.kevinallenmoore.com/viewt ... 8598#p8598
Even better reference: http://fastestlaps.com/tracks/motortrend-figure-8
Now this will be fun to look through.
You'll notice that when it comes to the absolute fastest thing you can get, the C7 Z06 is a total animal. Second only to the Porsche 918 million dollar supercar.
The GT350R is #28 for context.
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
Re-quoted for emphasis: The ATS-V is significantly faster around the figure 8 than the new Camaro SS. I think this should be the case. But the more interesting question is, would the ATS-V be better performing with the LT1? Or just better sounding?billgiacheri wrote:Go ATS-V! I also guess that means that the new Camaro SS beats all of these. Even better!
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
That is interesting. Consider that the Camaro has more HP and Torque, Not by a lot but still, and it is the same chassis, except for supposed improvements, that made it worse???The ATS-V is significantly faster around the figure 8 than the new Camaro SS.
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
To be fair, I'd compare the ATS-V to the 1LE when it comes out. The gap will shrink.
Re: M/T: Top 10 sedans in figure-8 time
This is a little odd.
New ATS-V: 23.7
New Camaro SS: 24.1
Old ZL-1 convertible (4,373 lbs): 24.1
Old ZL-1 coupe: 23.9
Old 1LE: 24.2
New ATS-V: 23.7
New Camaro SS: 24.1
Old ZL-1 convertible (4,373 lbs): 24.1
Old ZL-1 coupe: 23.9
Old 1LE: 24.2