Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Non-repair car talk
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Post by kevm14 »

Every F150 I see driving down the road, late models included, has a very disconcerting bed vibration over bumps. GM trucks do not.

Reminds me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuqESiO_MFM

Which I posted in a previous aluminum body F150 thread.
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Post by bill25 »

I agree GM trucks are better. That doesn't mean all aluminum is bad. There isn't anything stopping Ford from using aluminum on more vehicles. I don't understand your arguments.
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Post by kevm14 »

Ford spent a ridiculous amount of money to get a merely competitive result on one vehicle. People acted like Ford was somehow "ahead" because of that, when it's the opposite.
bill25
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Post by bill25 »

Ford spent a ridiculous amount of money to get a merely competitive result on one vehicle.

This is from your pasted quote:
And the lessons learned will be applied to more vehicles including the SuperDuty pickup and next-generation Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator full-size SUVs.
kevm14
Posts: 16025
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:28 pm

Re: Aluminum Fords vs mixed material GMs

Post by kevm14 »

Right and the problem is, it sounded like most of the costs were in gutting and retooling, not "learning.". They would probably spent a good chunk of those costs again in a new facility. And they were some hefty costs. So once again, I stand by what I said.
Post Reply